A week ago I went to hear Dan Barber give a talk with Elizabeth Kolbert about his book, The Third Plate. Some of you may remember my brief mention of him in my notapoem, “Notes On A Poem About Compost.”
Toward the end of the event, Barber answered seven questions
collected from the audience on index cards. Highlights include: MY QUESTION WAS
THE SECOND CARD PICKED!
(Or another folk—or folks—had the same question. Totally
possible. Not as awesome-feeling. That question, “how do you define “local”?
deserves a post, err, dissertation all its own.)
Another question got to the marrow of what would be the third plate of the Berkshires. To explain
in one sentence or less what Barber takes a whole book to investigate, the “Third
Plate,” explores the “local” equivalent of terroir that we could hope to see in
2050.
Barber’s answer, “Rotation Risotto,” made me hungry. He gave
a waiter’s explanation of Rotation Risotto; “it’s nose to tail eating of the
whole farm” The dish include the crops needed for crop rotation, or companion
planting, on Blue Hill Farm.
In the Epilogue of
his book, Barber describes this dish as the second course of an entire menu of “whole
farm cooking." He also mentions “single udder butter,” which I think I
kinda want to eat all day, every day…… Christmas is coming. Please take me to Blue Hill Farm!
The trick to the flavor of the milk used for butter, the epilogue explains, is most certainly and obviously the cow’s diet. Grazing on
plants that grow in nutrient-rich soil determines the flavor of the milk, and
therefore butter, that is the kind of dreamy butter that I’m dreaming of now.
Barber’s epilogue explains how taste works for that butter,
that 'the trick is to learn the language of the soil.’
All you need to know about language: language generally refers to the learning and use of communication systems, their rules, and what those rule can produce. Semiotics is the relating of signs with meanings. All languages rely on this.
All you need to know about language: language generally refers to the learning and use of communication systems, their rules, and what those rule can produce. Semiotics is the relating of signs with meanings. All languages rely on this.
The semiotics of soil are fairly clear. Take the dust bowl
of the dirty 30’s. The application of European agricultural practices to land
that was, well, in America,
led to a dusty shit storm. We know Dorthea Lange’s powerful photographs about
this:
The dirty 30’s forced us to relate the signs (dust storms) with
meanings (we’re in deep, dusty trouble, we need to change our practices). The
semiotics there are clear. There was a big breakdown in the communication
system. We didn’t do language right in that situation.
Take a different example of a semiotic-soil-situation; the
companion planting process known as the three sisters. The three sisters, corn
(maize), beans, and squash, feed the soil and protect each other in specific
ways.
Beans climb the corn. Beans feed the soil nitrogen, which
the corn gobbles right up. Squash acts as a weed-blocker, like a mulch. The
three crops together also fulfill a wide range of dietary needs. How awesome is
that!
The semiotics in the example of the three sisters is pretty
clear, too. The signs are that these crops help each other, and together
provide a good nutritional assemblage. The meanings are even more lucid. This works,
this is symbiotic and smart.
Granted, thinking about “the language” of soil is an
exercise in metaphor. But it is an important exercise. “Learning the language
of soil” is what will teach us to agricultural practices that we need in order
to feed the world’s population. And it will keep that beautiful single utter
butter coming!*
*Dan Barber, if you’re reading this, do you ship your butter
to Albany?....
Ceci n'est pas une puppy. (final pun. apologies to the semiotic godfather, Magritte.)
Blue Hill at Stone Barns:
Blue Hill at Stone Barns:
http://www.bluehillfarm.com/food/blue-hill-stone-barns
semiotics for beginners:
http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/S4B/sem01.html