Monday, August 28, 2017

Lustmord Kunst/ Blut und Boden 2/2


If there is a genre for a found blog, this post belongs in that. 



In 2001, in college, while still studying art, I did a paper on Lustmord Kunst. This genre of art fell into the "Degenerate Art" that Hitler loathed. See the fictional account of this in the movie "Max" . My father had saved my paper. When he died it was still in his files. Yesterday, I dug it out.



Germany's art in this time period has historically been explained as a result of economic frustration with anger projected onto bodies of women. In 2001 I agreed with that line of thinking. Watching the rise of the Alt-Right, and nazis in America Right Now makes me revisit that line of reasoning.  


That was the argument that explained how America got its current president: he appealed to the economically disenfranchised. Those that felt like this glorious land had let them down. 


Looking at stats, the economically disenfranchised didn't make up his base. And it wasn't all male.


Take your pick: the epidemic of violence and murder against transwomen, death threats for women that dare to engage in tech culture, a man that has said grab them by the pussy/bleeding out of her you know what/ lock her up lock her up. We've heard all the things. 


I suggest there is a different argument to make about Lustmord Kunst. I don't see it as a unique genre critiquing a unique moment in time and economic structure, in a particular boden. Perhaps it gives us a window into transboden misogyny. 


As we continue doing the work of re-turning to history, and various archives try to figure out what exactly American nazis are capable of doing, I am curious about what Burkeain equipment for living the artistic archive that confronted and clashed with ideologies of Blut und Boden. 

Or maybe something at the tip of our tongues, like rhetorics of violence against women in video games, for example, is a rabbit-hole back to the lustmord kunst archive that is worth exploring. Other wormholes in the arts: the NEH, Shia LeBouf, Fifty Shades of Grey, "How I Met Your Mother," and the comments on discussions re: Joss Whedon & feminism.  


Yes, art as resistance. Yes, doing the work to stop what we can. Yes, this American land is painted with billions of buckets of blood from genocide. Appeals to logic (logos) haven't done shit. Neither have appeals to ethos. 

Pathos, is that where we are at? Is that all that's left?? If so, bring on the art, and turn us back to the archive not only of nazi tactics, but the arts of resistance, failure and projections .of masculinity onto  bodies and boden. Pay attention to the things that we allegedly said never again about.  

And ITMFA.

Thursday, August 24, 2017

Blood and Soil/ Blut und Boden ½*


Late last summer I did private language lessons with a student. He’s a legitimate genius. To add insult to injury, he’s kind additionally cursed with good looks, commanding stature, and an inhuman magnetism. This combination will continue to allow him to climb the ranks of his career at an astronomical speed.

When things started getting ugly on the campaign trail, I explained words and idioms that he heard at the water cooler. Dumpster Fire. Basket of Deplorables. MRA. Birther.

And here? Nothing! For the African Americans, you turn on the news and hear white people calling them that n word and it is okay. There is still the holiday for Chris Columbus? How is this possible? Growing up you hear that America is for equality and opportunity. Then I come, and I see it is

He looks down at his notes

              A big dumpster fire. Yes?

I nod.

              He cannot win to be president, can he? You think he can? No.

---------                                             (this was almost exactly a year ago.)

              But… I don’t understand this place.

He did a few loud breaths and shook his head. He told me that it was illegal in Germany to so much as mockingly do the nazi-salute. He explained the variety of laws against any public expression of (my words, not his) physical or visual rhetoric of nazism.

I tell him that I had no idea! I tell him that I wish we had laws like that here—in any way. I can’t even imagine what it’s like to live in a country that takes its past wrongs that seriously.

I can’t even do it here in this room to show you, Darcy. It feels so wrong. From when we are in kinder we get in bad trouble if we do. I simply don’t understand how there are all these people here in America that can and there is no shame, let alone it is legal. What the fuck?

He explained "Blud und Boden"—it was the first time I heard the phrase.

This was one of Nazi ideas. Kind of like a slogan to shout. Or idiom maybe? Blut und Boden. Blood and Soil. Soil is country, and Boden is the idea of the country, the.... homeland? 

Motherland?

              Yes. We call it that, Muterland. Or Vaterland. Like Star Wars.

We laugh.

             The Blood is like family history, and also what you have to do to keep it. It, this "blut und                    boden"—

In English!

Okay, it was blood and soil, okay?, that was the idea behind the guy, I don’t even want to say his name, invading Europe and trying to take the world. It goes to before him. They even had these terrible, terrible paintings with the name

Blood and Soil?

              Yes, “Blahd and Soyelle,” (winks). They were so bad, but they were the high kunst.

English! (I was required to always prompt in English).

Yes, yes, ahhrrrt. The art. But we know this history in Germany and that is why we have laws against it. Not the art in specifically, but you cannot do anything Nazi. It’s the worst, no one would do it because it is so wrong. It is so hard to explain because it is so simple. You know?

I know. I know….

Today the U.N. condems POTUS (but not really by name) for refusing to call it what it is. “Failure at the highest political level.”

I think about the day that guy taught me that phrase. Don’t tell me soil isn’t political.  It’s part of the semiotics central to foundational nazi ideation systems. Words matter. ITMFA. 



*This blog has no kundst, it usually does, but not today. More on that in 2/2. 

Monday, August 7, 2017

Dirty South 1/3


Last night, a short-term blog reader interviewed me. Kinda. Ok, it wasn’t exactly an interview, but it has since become one after writing it into being. In rewriting this moment I omitted the more personal Q and A’s, and most of my own Q’s.

I’m still new to this place, this person, and this genre. There is time for more later. This is the transcript of how I remember parts of it. Memory makes liberties.

Q: What brought you to Atlanta, was it Tech?
A: Yup, I took a postdoc at GA Tech.

Q: Is it a teaching or research fellowship?
A: I think it’s a bit of both? My understanding is that it is as much of both as you put into it, and you are there because you want to put both in. But teaching is, first and foremost, a requirement.

Q: How long have you been in town then?
A: Today is my one week anniversary!

Q: Congratulations! What kinds of things have you done so far?
A: In a week? I’ve mostly been avoiding mosquitoes. [Trying to get Lil John songs to STOP playing on a constant loop in my head. Brain keeps calling it THE DIRTY SOUTH. I hate the music from College.] I went to the High on Friday—saw the Warhol exhibit. You know, soup cans.


Q: Is that related to your work on food studies?
A: Nah….
[thinks to self, it probably should be. Crap, why didn’t I see that when I was there! Must return! Was too busy focusing on the Desdemona drawing that related to the novel written during May.]
…. I’m also looking forward to the Botanical gardens again, I can’t get there enough!



Q: So why blog about soil? What does this have to do with your research?
A: Excellent question! [Looks around the coffee shop. Why are the answers rarely written on ceilings? Gaining new appreciation for the Sistine Chapel.]
….Everything starts with the soil. Stories can’t happen, literally, without it. The way we used to take gender constructions for granted, until we didn’t, that’s why soil matters to me as a lens. It’s a simple part of our world that penetrates every single thing.

[I start rambling now]

The more publishers I talk to about the first major book project, the more they emphasize the need for an online presence that includes blogging. They’ve said it’s important to give a personal window to your voice, and that the voice is coming from a professional with complex research plans.

Q: Do you want to write a book like your blog?
A: I'm not sure. I know that I do keep coming back to this for some reason. [A line from "Nip/Tuck" When something is recurrent it is begging for attention and further consideration.]

Q: Do you think your blog helped you get hired at GA Tech?
A: Absolutely not. I was too scared to add it to my application materials.
Q: The could have googled you. That’s how I found it. Not a lot of work to find materials.
A: I do not think so. I think they had too many applicants to google all of them.


Q: They should google the potential hires. I learned a lot. Like the story behind that [points at Calvino tattoo]. I liked the information I got.
A: I’m truly happy that it held your interest, and that you actually wanted to ask questions. Thank you.
              [I didn’t do a good job expressing my adequate thanks. Had to do a follow-up email later.]

Q: Are you going to be teaching things related to your blog?
A: Not really. This semester it’s a class on Nobel prize winners in literature. That’s why I’m reading this right now.
              [waves copy of Bob Dylan’s Tarantula]

Q: The prize is really political, isn’t it? I’m still trying to make sense of Malala’s win. Other people have been working their lives towards bettering the world—mother Teresa level stuff—and she’s so young.
A: [pause.]  Agreed, in that it’s a complicated decision-making process. I mostly focus the research on the literature prize. Some people, like Murakami and Rushdie—or maybe more so their fans—have similar frustrations with the awards.


Q: Recently you wrote about Rushdie’s The Ground Beneath Her Feet. You seem to be quite a fan. What is it that you love about his writing?
A: [Awkward pause]
              ….. I think he’s an incredibly intelligent man. I do have some difficulty enjoying the aesthetic of contemporary magical realism. It doesn’t always work for me.
Q: So you aren’t a fan of his work?
A: I’m not a fan of contemporary magical realism? [uncomfortable laughter] It’s inaccessible to me. I know that’s part of the point, but I don’t want it. I gravitate towards writing with, this will sound silly, shorter sentences.
Q: Shorter sentences? Why?
A: I like short, simple sentences. I like clarity as an aesthetic. Simple beauty moves me.
[Reduction, not what feels like humid writing.]

Q: Can you give me an example of a writer like that?
A: [I thrust my forearm forward, grinning.] Italio Calvino.

Q: Putting it that way—short sentences that try to emphasize clarity—thinking about it now I would say that’s a characteristic I can see in your writing. It makes sense, I liked that even if I didn’t know that’s what I was reading.
A: [Blush. Blush so hot my face burns off.]
              [EMTs are called to extinguish my face.]
[The interview continues despite the fact that my face is bandaged and I can hardly see the world through the cotton.]
Thank you. That is the biggest compliment I could possibly receive.

Q: You’re welcome. Do you ever blog about encounters like this?
A: Absolutely not!
Q: Why not? You could leave it anonymous, name someone “Mister XYZ”?
A. I’m really uncomfortable doing that. Words can hurt, more quickly and deeper than other things. They can construct expectations or interfaces that cannot be undone. Those structures can linger, and they can inadvertently do damage.


Q: But it’s your life, and your experiences, I can’t imagine that you wouldn’t want to write about them. Like that post about the man that wouldn’t give you a a kiss in Paris.
A: That was extraordinarily different. I had been in a pattern of seemingly having to tell that story over and over again—I wanted it somewhere so I didn’t have to keep making the words come out of my mouth. And I do provide a disclaimer about how I dislike that kind of writing.

Q: Fair enough. Do you think you’ll write about this?
A: Absolutely not.*

Q: It’s getting on in time. Are you hungry? Can you eat given your face bandages?
A: Sure, let’s.**


<end scene>

*This particular Q & A did not occur. It if had, I would have said no, and then still done exactly what I’m doing right now.

**I should have went for the food. I did not go for the food. Muss and Turners would have been really good just then. Thunderstorms and my poor souphound’s potential storm adjustment compelled me homeward. I got home and took him out. The residual rain dissolved my face bandages. They must have been made of sugar after all.
I check my face again, it’s gone back to regular temperature. I check the sentences I, allegedly, spoke. Not the beautiful ones I prefer to write. I prepare to post this, I break a pattern of what I usually write. Eggshells go everywhere. I prepare to rub egg on my face and walls. My kitchen barely has towels.